Author summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruth Cronin results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 438 hits . Analysis detected 1,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,639 of 8,721 authors). This Ruth Cronin is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Ruth Cronin
Author details
Total words: 3,988
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.0% 11.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst