Author summary
9%1 analyzed article/video333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roman Battaglia results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 448 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,160 of 8,764 authors). This Roman Battaglia is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Roman Battaglia
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
42%Roman Battaglia (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,332
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510041.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos