Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 1,026 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roderick Wong results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Overconfidence Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 588 hits . Analysis detected 4,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,969 of 9,486 authors). This Roderick Wong is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Roderick Wong
Author details
Total words: 4,104
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.3% 9.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 12.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst