Author summary
21% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Pozarycki results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 258 hits . Analysis detected 1,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,428 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (6,467 of 9,471 authors). This Robert Pozarycki is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Robert Pozarycki
Author details
Total words: 4,428
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst