Author summary
99%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert DeMay results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 842 hits. Analysis detected 5,117 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (641 of 9,195 authors). This Robert DeMay is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Robert DeMay
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
93%Robert DeMay (selected)8%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,148
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510093.0% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 39.2%39.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 31.6%31.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 13.6%13.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 25.1%25.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 27.3%27.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 39.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 27.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 25.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 20.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 13.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos