Author summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 1,964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Lownie results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 1,900 hits . Analysis detected 8,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 79% (2,066 of 9,471 authors). This Rob Lownie is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group. Rob Lownie
Author details
Total words: 5,892
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.3% 32.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.8% 28.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 28.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst