Author summary
97%1 analyzed article/video1,964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Lownie results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 1,900 hits. Analysis detected 8,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 79% (2,066 of 9,471 authors). This Rob Lownie is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Rob Lownie
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
79%Rob Lownie (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,892
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510078.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 32.3%32.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 28.8%28.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 28.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos