Author summary
24%1 analyzed article/video1,964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Davies results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 438 hits. Analysis detected 3,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (7,814 of 8,525 authors). This Rob Davies is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Rob Davies
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
9%Rob Davies (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,856
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

8% percentile
02550751008.3% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos