Author summary
⁠14%2 analyzed articles/videos1,854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ritsuko Kawai results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 3,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,416 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (7,406 of 9,205 authors). This Ritsuko Kawai is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Ritsuko Kawai
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠20%Ritsuko Kawai (selected)2%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,416
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos