Author summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 921 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Lettieri Ph.D. results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 436 hits . Analysis detected 2,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (2,494 of 9,471 authors). This Richard Lettieri Ph.D. is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Richard Lettieri Ph.D.
Author details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.8% 11.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst