Author summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video5,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renée Bartlett-Webber results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 786 hits. Analysis detected 2,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,513 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (9,228 of 9,471 authors). This Renée Bartlett-Webber is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Renée Bartlett-Webber
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠3%Renée Bartlett-Webber (selected)1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,513
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751002.6% percentile
0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.3%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos