Author summary
23% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,885 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ren Zaro Fitzgerald results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 306 hits . Analysis detected 2,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,281 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 26% (6,874 of 9,213 authors). This Ren Zaro Fitzgerald is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Ren Zaro Fitzgerald
Author details
Total words: 6,281
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst