Author summary
32%2 analyzed articles/videos800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Black results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 509 hits. Analysis detected 987 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,962 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,256 of 9,471 authors). This Rebecca Black is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Rebecca Black
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
87%Rebecca Black (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,962
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.7% percentile
4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.9%5.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos