Author summary
46% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Spears results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 858 hits . Analysis detected 5,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,640 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 26% (7,097 of 9,487 authors). This Rachel Spears is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Rachel Spears
Author details
Total words: 9,640
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst