Author summary
95%1 analyzed article/video1,367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Janfaza results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 724 hits. Analysis detected 3,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,101 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,351 of 9,467 authors). This Rachel Janfaza is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Rachel Janfaza
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
86%Rachel Janfaza (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,101
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.6%17.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.3%15.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 13.8%13.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos