Author summary
50% 2 analyzed articles/videos 432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Priyanka Dayal McCluskey results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 291 hits . Analysis detected 1,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,302 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (6,053 of 9,456 authors). This Priyanka Dayal McCluskey is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Priyanka Dayal McCluskey
Author details
Total words: 3,302
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst