Author summary
21% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,234 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Priscilla Totiyapungprasert results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 635 hits . Analysis detected 4,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,740 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (8,341 of 8,575 authors). This Priscilla Totiyapungprasert is better (less manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Priscilla Totiyapungprasert
Author details
Total words: 13,740
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.7% percentile 0.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst