Author summary
97%3 analyzed articles/videos226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Praveena Somasundaram results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 1,897 faulty-reasoning hits from 904 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 95% (469 of 8,957 authors). This Praveena Somasundaram is worse (more manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
Praveena Somasundaram
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
95%Praveena Somasundaram (selected)9%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 904
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

95% percentile
025507510094.8% percentile
8.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles904 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 30.8%30.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 40.4%40.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.6%16.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.9%10.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.0%7.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.0%5.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 40.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 25.0%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 13.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate