Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Peter Salisbury results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, False Dilemma, and Optimism Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 512 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,799 authors). This Peter Salisbury is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Peter Salisbury
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Peter Salisbury (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 5,956
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 3.9%3.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos