Author summary
41% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Rosenberger results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 953 hits . Analysis detected 7,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,572 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (7,454 of 8,529 authors). This Peter Rosenberger is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Peter Rosenberger
Author details
Total words: 13,572
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst