Author summary
ā 65%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Nickeas results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hindsight Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 274 faulty-reasoning hits from 288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of ā 98% (211 of 9,471 authors). This Peter Nickeas is worse (more manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
Peter Nickeas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 98%Peter Nickeas (selected)14%
ā 100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 288
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510097.8% percentile
13.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles288 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 24.0%24.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.7%16.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.4%10.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 19.4%19.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 19.4%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 24.0%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos