Author summary
97% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Bradshaw results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 5,245 hits . Analysis detected 13,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,138 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,219 of 9,459 authors). This Peter Bradshaw is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Peter Bradshaw
Author details
Total words: 10,138
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 51.7% 51.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 51.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst