Author summary
8% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Blanchard results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 336 hits . Analysis detected 2,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,132 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (8,522 of 8,780 authors). This Peter Blanchard is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Peter Blanchard
Author details
Total words: 11,132
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 0.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst