Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video71 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Schwartzman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 64.8% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 544 faulty-reasoning hits from 284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (15 of 9,455 authors). This Paul Schwartzman is worse (more manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.
Paul Schwartzman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Paul Schwartzman (selected)32%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 284
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

100% percentile
025507510099.9% percentile
31.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles284 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 64.8%64.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 35.2%35.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 47.2%47.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 14.8%14.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 14.8%14.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 14.8%14.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Author 64.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 47.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 35.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 14.8%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos