Author summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 1,571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Finkelman results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 592 hits . Analysis detected 5,307 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,583 of 9,468 authors). This Paul Finkelman is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Paul Finkelman
Author details
Total words: 6,284
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst