Author summary
51% 2 analyzed articles/videos 625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oona Milliken results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 400 hits . Analysis detected 2,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,226 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,345 of 8,882 authors). This Oona Milliken is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Oona Milliken
Author details
Total words: 4,226
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst