Author summary
28% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Prentzel results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 2,457 hits . Analysis detected 14,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,980 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (8,921 of 9,471 authors). This Olivia Prentzel is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Olivia Prentzel
Author details
Total words: 35,980
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 1.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles36K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst