Author summary
19% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Marble results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 256 hits . Analysis detected 2,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,768 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 14% (8,102 of 9,336 authors). This Olivia Marble is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Olivia Marble
Author details
Total words: 5,768
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst