Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olga Pierce results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 314 hits . Analysis detected 3,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (8,522 of 9,471 authors). This Olga Pierce is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Olga Pierce
Author details
Total words: 8,352
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst