Author summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video1,105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nstarobin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 425 hits. Analysis detected 3,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (3,781 of 9,238 authors). This Nstarobin is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Nstarobin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠60%Nstarobin (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,420
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos