Author summary
â 38% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nosmot Gbadamosi results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,059 hits . Analysis detected 6,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of â 17% (7,205 of 8,637 authors). This Nosmot Gbadamosi is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. Nosmot Gbadamosi
Author details
Total words: 12,960
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst