Author summary
93% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nnamdi Egwuonwu results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 626 hits . Analysis detected 6,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,343 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 56% (4,113 of 9,297 authors). This Nnamdi Egwuonwu is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Nnamdi Egwuonwu
Author details
Total words: 7,343
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst