Author summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Acevedo results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 893 hits . Analysis detected 3,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 91% (919 of 9,471 authors). This Nicole Acevedo is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Nicole Acevedo
Author details
Total words: 2,888
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.3% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 30.9% 30.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.0% 14.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 30.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst