Author summary
18%2 analyzed articles/videos1,473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicolas Garriga results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 1,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,892 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (7,371 of 8,643 authors). This Nicolas Garriga is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group.
Nicolas Garriga
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
15%Nicolas Garriga (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,892
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510014.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos