Author summary
27%1 analyzed article/video921 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Reynolds nreynolds@postandcourier.com results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,337 of 9,457 authors). This Nick Reynolds nreynolds@postandcourier.com is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Nick Reynolds nreynolds@postandcourier.com
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
33%Nick Reynolds nreynolds@postandcourier.com (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

33% percentile
025507510033.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos