Author summary
94%1 analyzed article/video91 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Pompella results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Anchoring Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 47.3% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 900 faulty-reasoning hits from 364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of 99% (129 of 9,488 authors). This Nick Pompella is worse (more manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Nick Pompella
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
99%Nick Pompella (selected)17%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 364
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

99% percentile
025507510098.7% percentile
16.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles364 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 47.3%47.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 34.1%34.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 31.9%31.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 22.0%22.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 22.0%22.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 17.6%17.6%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 11.0%11.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 11.0%11.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Pessimism Bias: Author 47.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 31.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 22.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 22.0%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 11.0%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 11.0%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 0.3%Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos