Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 91 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Pompella results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Anchoring Bias , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 47.3% saturation with 172 hits . Analysis detected 900 faulty-reasoning hits from 364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of 99% (129 of 9,488 authors). This Nick Pompella is worse (more manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Nick Pompella
Author details
Total words: 364
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.7% percentile 16.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles364 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 47.3% 47.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 34.1% 34.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 31.9% 31.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 22.0% 22.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 22.0% 22.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 17.6% 17.6% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 11.0% 11.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 11.0% 11.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 11.0% 11.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Pessimism Bias: Author 47.3%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 31.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 22.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 22.0%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 11.0%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 11.0%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 0.3% Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst