Author summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 1,369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Cater results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 774 hits . Analysis detected 5,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,432 of 9,251 authors). This Nick Cater is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Nick Cater
Author details
Total words: 5,476
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.1% 14.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst