Author summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 1,286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Times Company results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 521 hits . Analysis detected 2,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,448 of 9,481 authors). This New York Times Company is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. New York Times Company
Author details
Total words: 5,144
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst