Author summary
â 4% 1 analyzed article/video 1,920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ned Oliver results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 205 hits . Analysis detected 1,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of â 2% (8,450 of 8,541 authors). This Ned Oliver is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group. Ned Oliver
Author details
Total words: 7,680
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.1% percentile 0.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Composition/Division: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst