Author summary
62%10 analyzed articles/videos16,509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan J. Robinson results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 5,232 hits. Analysis detected 53,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 73,782 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (7,637 of 9,471 authors). This Nathan J. Robinson is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Nathan J. Robinson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
20%Nathan J. Robinson (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 73,782
Article count: 10
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510019.4% percentile
1.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles73.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate