Author summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 1,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Javitt results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 415 hits . Analysis detected 1,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (7,736 of 8,960 authors). This Natalie Javitt is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Natalie Javitt
Author details
Total words: 6,056
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst