Author summary
ā 24%1 analyzed article/video597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Albrecht results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 963 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ā 56% (4,254 of 9,538 authors). This Natalie Albrecht is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Natalie Albrecht
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 56%Natalie Albrecht (selected)3%
ā 100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,388
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 10.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos