Author summary
53%1 analyzed article/video1,944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mosabber Hossain results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 802 hits. Analysis detected 3,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,823 of 8,706 authors). This Mosabber Hossain is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Mosabber Hossain
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
45%Mosabber Hossain (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,776
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos