Author summary
32%1 analyzed article/video1,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MORIAH BALINGIT AP education writer results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 2,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (7,388 of 8,843 authors). This MORIAH BALINGIT AP education writer is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
MORIAH BALINGIT AP education writer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
17%MORIAH BALINGIT AP education writer (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,792
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510016.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos