Author summary
71%1 analyzed article/video933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mona Sloane results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,483 of 8,568 authors). This Mona Sloane is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Mona Sloane
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
60%Mona Sloane (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,732
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.2%11.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos