Author summary
13%2 analyzed articles/videos7,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Moe Long results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 1,230 hits. Analysis detected 11,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,190 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 22% (6,740 of 8,561 authors). This Moe Long is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Moe Long
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
22%Moe Long (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 22,190
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510021.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles22.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos