Author summary
91%1 analyzed article/video686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Michener results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 3,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,767 of 8,706 authors). This Mike Michener is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Mike Michener
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
80%Mike Michener (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,744
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.9%8.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.7%5.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 8.6%8.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos