Author summary
89% 6 analyzed articles/videos 8,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Ludwig results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 4,432 hits . Analysis detected 38,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,560 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (4,763 of 8,953 authors). This Mike Ludwig is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Mike Ludwig
Author details
Total words: 35,560
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles35.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst