Author summary
83% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Davis results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 2,757 hits . Analysis detected 27,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,629 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 52% (4,177 of 8,677 authors). This Mike Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Mike Davis
Author details
Total words: 24,629
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles24.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.5% 4.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst