Author summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mick LaSalle results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 601 hits . Analysis detected 1,937 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,974 of 8,616 authors). This Mick LaSalle is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Mick LaSalle
Author details
Total words: 2,692
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.3% 22.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.9% 10.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.3%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst