Author summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 2,451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Fuchs results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,114 hits . Analysis detected 4,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,353 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 63% (3,453 of 9,207 authors). This Michael Fuchs is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. Michael Fuchs
Author details
Total words: 7,353
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.2% 15.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Tu Quoque: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst